Combat scoring
Points, penalties, warnings, hansoku, rounds, golden score and sudden death with synchronised match clocks.
05
Judging systems
Judging screens built for the way your sport actually scores — configurable per discipline, ready for tablets on the field of play.
Overview
Scoring is where a competition earns or loses its credibility. Fitofan provides judging interfaces designed per discipline: point-based combat scoring with penalties and rounds, artistic panels with difficulty and execution components, and timed or measured events with attempts and tolerances.
Every input is attributed to a named judge and a specific device, timestamped and stored with the match record. After the event, deviation reports show how each judge scored relative to the panel, giving heads of officials the evidence they need for development and appointments.
Judging screens drive the public scoreboard, the venue displays and the live result feed simultaneously, so spectators, coaches and the online audience always see the same state of play as the officials.
What's included
Capabilities inside judging systems
Artistic panels
Multi-judge panels with trimmed averages, difficulty, execution and deduction components per routine.
Timed and measured events
Times, distances, attempts and weights captured with tolerance, wind and height fields.
Judge accountability
Every input signed by judge and device, with post-event deviation and consistency reports.
Scoreboards and displays
Venue screens, streaming overlays and public pages driven by the same live data.
Rule packs
Configure scoring per discipline and per age group, and version the rule pack when regulations change.
How it works
The workflow, step by step
- STEP 01
Configure the rule pack
Define scoring elements, penalties, round structure and tie-break logic for each discipline.
- STEP 02
Assign officials
Allocate judges to fields of play and panels, with conflict-of-interest checks.
- STEP 03
Score live
Judges use tablets; the clock, scoreboard and result feed update in real time.
- STEP 04
Resolve disputes
Video review is opened from the match record itself, and any correction is logged.
- STEP 05
Review afterwards
Publish protocols and analyse judge consistency for future appointments.
Who it's for
Heads of officials
Objective data on every judge instead of impressions gathered at the table.
Organisers
Fewer scoring errors, faster mats and no manual transfer of scores into results.
Athletes and coaches
A visible, timestamped score they can review rather than dispute blindly.
Works with
Connected to the rest of the platform
Video review system
Replay requests open directly from the scoring screen.
LEARN MORE →Competition management
Scores close matches and advance the draw instantly.
LEARN MORE →PR management
Live scores feed public pages and broadcast overlays.
LEARN MORE →Part of these solutions
FAQ
Judging systems: common questions
- What hardware is required?
- Standard tablets or laptops with a browser, plus a display for the venue scoreboard. No proprietary terminals are needed.
- What happens if a tablet loses connection?
- The judging screen continues locally and resynchronises when the network returns; the match clock is never lost.
- Can we match our international federation's scoring rules?
- Yes. Rule packs are configurable and versioned, so you can mirror your international federation's current regulations.